π Evaluation Questionnaire Dear participant, The Center for Educational Studies and Research (CERP) is committed to continuously developing its programs. Please fill out this form carefully. The collected information remains confidential (estimated time: 3 to 5 minutes). Part One: General Information 1. What is your role / field of activity? Administrative Manager / OfficerTeacher / TrainerResearcher / University ProfessorStudentExpert / ConsultantPublic Institution RepresentativeCivil Society Organization RepresentativePrivate Sector RepresentativeParent of a student Other: 2. Have you previously participated in a CERP program? Yes, onceYes, multiple timesThis is my first participation 3. What type of program did you participate in? Scientific SeminarCongress / ConferenceProfessional TrainingWorkshopStudy or ResearchDiscussion ForumScientific Publication Other program: 4. Title of the program or activity: 5. Date of participation: Part Two: Program Content Evaluation The program theme was clearly defined. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The theme was aligned with my interests / field of activity. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The content was well-structured and coherent. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The content was rich and useful. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The content provided a good balance between theory and practice. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The program addressed priority issues in the field of education. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The program was based on data, evidence, and studies. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor The program allowed participants to benefit from relevant experience and expertise. ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Part Three: Speakers, Experts, and Trainers Evaluation Scientific mastery of the subject: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Clarity of the presentation: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Quality of examples and practical applications: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Ability to interact with participants: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Respect of time limits: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Handling questions and leading discussions: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Part Four: Organization Evaluation Registration and participation process: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Communication prior to the program: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Clarity of the program schedule: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Venue quality: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Equipment and technical facilities: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Reception and orientation: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Time management: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Quality of documentation and provided materials: ExcellentVery GoodGoodAcceptablePoor Part Five: Overall Evaluation of CERP Programs 1. Overall rating of CERP programs: 1 β Very Poor2 β Poor3 β Acceptable4 β Good5 β Excellent 2. Scientific value of the Center's programs: 1 β Very Poor2 β Poor3 β Acceptable4 β Good5 β Excellent 3. Contribution to educational dialogue in Mauritania: 1 β Very Poor2 β Poor3 β Acceptable4 β Good5 β Excellent 4. Bridging scientific research and educational practice: 1 β Very Poor2 β Poor3 β Acceptable4 β Good5 β Excellent 5. Alignment with education reform priorities in Mauritania: 1 β Very Low2 β Low3 β Moderate4 β High5 β Very High Part Six: Suggestions and Feedback 1. What aspect of the program did you appreciate the most? 2. Which aspects do you think should be improved? 3. Which topics would you suggest CERP cover in future programs? 4. What types of programs would you like to participate in going forward? Professional TrainingScientific SeminarsCongresses / ConferencesSpecialized WorkshopsStudies and ResearchJoint Research ProgramsProfessional MeetingsOnline / Remote Programs Other: 5. Ideas or recommendations to help CERP develop its programs: Part Seven: CERP Recommendation Would you recommend participating in CERP programs? Strongly recommendRecommendMight recommendDo not recommend Would you like to join CERP as a member? YesMaybeNo Would you like to receive information regarding future programs and activities? YesNo Email address (optional): Single main open question: If you could make only one recommendation to CERP to improve its programs, what would it be?
